3/18/2024 0 Comments Commonretrospect for life rym![]() I would like to know what should be used as the source for the annual charts in Austria, because I noticed that the ones posted on austriancharts.at do not match what is posted on the Hitradio Ö3 website and the sources are being changed. (They blanked that warning, for what it's worth.) Sergecross73 msg me 22:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC) In ictu oculi ( talk) 22:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC) NB Sergecross73: Atlantic306: Geschichte: EddieHugh: could you please review the Sikonmina account's first edit, does it look like a new editor to you? In ictu oculi ( talk) 22:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC) For what it's worth, I've already given him a final warning that he's going to be blocked if I see any more patterns of hasty/sloppy/ill-conceived redirections or AFD nominations. And take note of the messages you have been removing from various experienced and long-standing accounts at your Talk page. QuietHere ( talk) 13:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Sikonmina - given the feedback you've been getting about your album blanking since this new 10 Sept 2021 account started, perhaps you should review all of your album blanking decisions. You're the first person I can remember having an objection to Sputnikmusic in the time I've been active in this WikiProject so something tells me that's not gonna be so easy, but don't let me be the one to stop you if you've got something to share. You're gonna have to provide evidence as to the unreliability of the site and gather a consensus in favor of deprecation before it can happen. contribs) 08:16, Janu(UTC) Personally, I wouldn't accept "err on the side of caution" in this case, and I have a feeling I'm not alone in that. ![]() Preceding unsigned comment added by Sikonmina ( talk I would err on the side of caution and depreciate sputnikmusic. QuietHere ( talk) 13:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC) I've only looked at the archive so I haven't looked at the history, but the participants haven't provided any proof of the reliability/credibility of the reviewer stratification. Anything else would fall under USERG, but those should be fine (unless you know something the participants in this 2017 discussion don't). Isn't Sputnikmusic WP:UGC? Why is it considered reliable? Sikonmina ( talk) 12:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Per its entry at WP:RSMUSIC, we only use reviews which are tagged as either "staff" or "emeritus". The 2022 charts aren't particularly notable unless the song climbs back up suddenly or even overtakes its previous record, and since no such thing has happened so far in its chart run there's no need for a second whole table to document non-notable chart presence. Richard3120 ( talk) 16:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC) For what it's worth, I second Lk95's reasoning here. Lk95 ( talk) 15:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC) Lk95: Eurohunter is referring to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 64#Weekly charts. We can only extend the time bracket to 2022. Lk95: Eurohunter ( talk) 15:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC) Not quite sure what you're trying to get at here but I removed the 2022 positions in favor of the peaks it had already reached in 2021 as we don't document chart positions for each year with the exception of a few Christmas songs or songs that regained popularity long after they peaked. ![]() ![]() I know there would be problem to include 50 years of peaks for some Christmas hits. It would be missleading to add new peaks only if it states "2021 weekly chart performance for" - and then lower peaks would became redundant. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |